Common Errors (21): Etruscan Origins

Etruscan urn from Chiusi. Rijksmuseum van oudheden, Leiden

Etruscan urn from Chiusi. Rijksmuseum van oudheden, Leiden

Just north of Rome were the cities of the Etruscans, twelve in number, according to the tradition. This nation has a reputation of being very mysterious. And it is true that they lacked the necessary credentials to give other ancient nations the idea that they understood the Etruscans: their origins were contested. The Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus claims that they came from Lydia in western Turkey (Histories, 1.94). However, the Greek writer Dionysius – also a native of Halicarnassus – objected that the Etruscans did not speak Lydian and did not sacrifice to eastern gods (Roman Antiquities, 1.30.2). He concluded that they had to be native Italians.

The mystery was not diminished when nineteenth-century scholars discovered that the Etruscan language did not belong to the Indo-European language family. Its speakers were therefore unrelated to the other Italian and Anatolian people. Because it was believed, back then, that language told something about a nation’s nature, the Etruscans were more enigmatic than ever.

It would be exaggerated to say that all riddles have been solved in the twentieth century, but much progress has been made. DNA research appears to have shown that at least part of the people that were later known as Etruscans are related to people in Asia Minor: there seems to have been a migration from the eastern part of the Mediterranean to Italy. This conclusion has been corroborated by the results of DNA research on goats, which also appear to have arrived from the east. These results have not been without criticism, though. Still, the language is now better understood than ever. Although we can not establish to which languages Etruscan is related, we can read most inscriptions, recognize cases and conjugations, and make a dictionary. There’s little left of the Etruscan mystery.

<Overview of Common Errors>

About these ads

4 Responses to Common Errors (21): Etruscan Origins

  1. Bill Thayer says:

    Just noticed the image on this post, I mean I just took a real look at it. It looks so modern, doesn’t it! Yes, the museum at Chiusi had to be closed for several years not so long ago, while they went thru the collection item by item to throw out the many fakes: the locals, once they realized how much people wanted Etruscan stuff, were glad to oblige, and a substantial cottage industry shot up that made Etruscan artifacts. A few of the fakes are still on display, marked as such.

    In sum, I don’t trust this 20c face; and it doesn’t look a bit like most real Etruscan portraiture. Did the Rijskmuseum get snookered?

  2. Mario Alinei – emeritus professor at the University of Utrecht, where he taught from 1959 to 1987 sees “Etruscan as a very archaic form of Hungarian (Magyar)”, as part of his 2003 ‘theory of continuity’. [alinei]

  3. Yes, and there’s a webpage out there that translates the Perusine Cippus [a legal real estate contract] as the account of a dream, because it’s written in Albanian-Gheg.

  4. I already sent a message to the spambox about the Etruscans being black Africans.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 324 other followers

%d bloggers like this: